Article 5.3 of the WHO FCTC: a smokescreen?

Document Type : Letter(s) to Editor

Author

Independent Researcher, 80000 Amiens, France

10.34172/ahj.1759

Abstract

Rani and colleagues should be commended for investigating barriers to implementing tobacco control measures—specifically Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).(1) Yet, deeper concerns deserve mention.
First, it must be acknowledged that the FCTC has largely failed to accelerate progress. Between 1980 and 2004—the year of the Convention—the annual decline in daily smoking prevalence reached 2%, but it subsequently plateaued. More recently, the GBD 2019 Tobacco Collaborators reported a significant increase in smoking prevalence since 2005 in 111 countries.
Second, Rani et al. correctly identify “conflicts of interest involving government officials, lobbying by the tobacco industry, resource constraints, and weak regulatory frameworks.” Public officials who choose to protect a lethal industry over their citizens’ health are not victims of lobbying—they are, at times, its active accomplices.
In my opinion, the WHO FCTC has become a smokescreen:
a) The WHO has remained blind and silent in the face of inertia and open breaches of the Convention by signatory countries, rendering it little more than a symbolic document.
b) The WHO has shown little willingness to defend states that act.
c) The WHO has failed to promote nicotine reduction
d) Finally, the WHO has not updated the Convention to address electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)

Highlights

Alain Braillon(Google scholar)(Pubmed)

Keywords


  1. Rani N, Wasnik M, Singh S. Navigating challenges in tobacco control: a systematic review of barriers to implementing article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Addict Health 2025;17:1603. doi:10.34172/ahj.1603
  2. Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD, Robinson M, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Thomson B, et al. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012. JAMA 2014;311(2):183-92. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284692
  3. Hoffman SJ, Poirier MJP, Rogers Van Katwyk S, Baral P, Sritharan L. Impact of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control on global cigarette consumption: quasi-experimental evaluations using interrupted time series analysis and in-sample forecast event modelling. BMJ 2019;365:l2287. doi:10.1136/bmj.l2287
  4. GBD 2019 Tobacco Collaborators. Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2021;397(10292):2337- 60. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01169-7
  5. Braillon A. Industry to influence policymaking: it takes two to tango, and the industry is not the leader. Public Health Res Pract 2023;33(3). doi:10.17061/phrp3332327
  6. Braillon A. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Lancet 2016;387(10031):1907. doi:10.1016/s0140- 6736(16)30420-2
  7. Benowitz NL, Henningfield JE. Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation. N Engl J Med 1994;331(2):123-5. doi:10.1056/ nejm199407143310212
  8. Stevenson T, Proctor RN. The secret and soul of Marlboro: Phillip Morris and the origins, spread, and denial of nicotine freebasing. Am J Public Health 2008;98(7):1184-94. doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.121657
  9. Arora M, Kulkarni MM, Ghosal S, Sathyan A, Gupta M, Verma S, et al. E-cigarettes and the nicotine epidemic: statement from the international pediatric association. Pediatrics 2025;156(5):e2025072337. doi:10.1542/peds.2025-072337
  10. Braillon A, Lang AE. The International Agency for Research on Cancer and e-cigarette carcinogenicity: time for an evaluation. Eur J Epidemiol 2023;38(4):391. doi:10.1007/s10654-023- 00993-7
  11. Braillon A. Global health challenges facing bureaucracy: democratization or revolution? Public Health 2014;128(12):1134-5. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.007