The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Craving and Relapse Rates in Opioid-Dependent Patients Undergoing Methadone Maintenance Therapy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

10.34172/ahj.1620

Abstract

Background: Addiction is a chronic and debilitating condition associated with compulsive behaviors, cravings, and high relapse rates. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique for the treatment of substance use disorders by targeting brain areas involved in craving and inhibitory control. This study aimed to assess tDCS effectiveness in reducing cravings in opioid-dependent patients on methadone maintenance therapy (MMT).
Methods: A total of 60 opioid-dependent participants were randomly assigned to either an active intervention group or a sham group. The intervention group received ten sessions of anodal tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cathodal tDCS over the right DLPFC. Craving was measured using the Desire for Drug Questionnaire (DDQ) before and after the intervention.
Findings: This study found no statistically significant differences in craving scores between the intervention and sham groups. There was no statistically significant difference in craving score changes between the two groups before and after the intervention.
Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the specific tDCS protocol used, targeting the left DLPFC with anodal stimulation and the right DLPFC with cathodal stimulation, did not significantly reduce craving in opioid-dependent patients undergoing MMT. The study highlights the need for further research to optimize tDCS protocols and explore alternative brain targets for the treatment of substance craving and relapse prevention.

Highlights

Alireza Ebrahimi(Google Scholar)(Pubmed)

Keywords

References

  1. Dawe S, Gullo MJ, Loxton NJ. Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: implications for substance misuse. Addict Behav. 2004;29(7):1389-405. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.06.004.
  2. Hyman SE, Malenka RC. Addiction and the brain: the neurobiology of compulsion and its persistence. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(10):695-703. doi: 10.1038/35094560.
  3. Moallem NR, Ray LA. Dimensions of impulsivity among heavy drinkers, smokers, and heavy drinking smokers: singular and combined effects. Addict Behav. 2012;37(7):871-4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.002.
  4. Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):64-105. doi: 10.1037/0033- 2909.112.1.64.
  5. Lynskey MT, Heath AC, Bucholz KK, Slutske WS, Madden PA, Nelson EC, et al. Escalation of drug use in early-onset cannabis users vs co-twin controls. JAMA. 2003;289(4):427- 33. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.4.427.
  6. Kandel D, Yamaguchi K. From beer to crack: developmental patterns of drug involvement. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(6):851-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.851.
  7. Szerman N, Torrens M, Maldonado R, Balhara YP, Salom C, Maremmani I, et al. Addictive and other mental disorders: a call for a standardized definition of dual disorders. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):446. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022- 02212-5.
  8. Dehghani-Arani F, Rostami R, Nadali H. Neurofeedback training for opiate addiction: improvement of mental health and craving. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2013;38(2):133-41. doi: 10.1007/s10484-013-9218-5.
  9. Tiffany ST, Drobes DJ. The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges. Br J Addict. 1991;86(11):1467-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991. tb01732.x.
  10. da Silva MC, Conti CL, Klauss J, Alves LG, do Nascimento Cavalcante HM, Fregni F, et al. Behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plasticity in alcohol dependence. J Physiol Paris. 2013;107(6):493-502. doi: 10.1016/j. jphysparis.2013.07.003.
  11. Jansen JM, Daams JG, Koeter MW, Veltman DJ, van den Brink W, Goudriaan AE. Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on craving: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(10 Pt 2):2472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.009.
  12. Sokhadze TM, Cannon RL, Trudeau DL. EEG biofeedback as a treatment for substance use disorders: review, rating of efficacy, and recommendations for further research. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2008;33(1):1-28. doi: 10.1007/ s10484-007-9047-5.
  13. Chan YH, Chang HM, Lu ML, Goh KK. Targeting cravings in substance addiction with transcranial direct current stimulation: insights from a meta-analysis of sham-controlled trials. Psychiatry Res. 2024;331:115621. doi: 10.1016/j. psychres.2023.115621.
  14. Jaberzadeh S, Bastani A, Zoghi M. Anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A novel technique to enhance corticospinal excitability. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(2):344-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.025.
  15. Lefaucheur JP, Wendling F. Mechanisms of action of tDCS: a brief and practical overview. Neurophysiol Clin. 2019;49(4):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2019.07.013.
  16. Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(10):1642-52. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642.
  17. Klauss J, Penido Pinheiro LC, Silva Merlo BL, de Almeida Correia Santos G, Fregni F, Nitsche MA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of targeted prefrontal cortex modulation with tDCS in patients with alcohol dependence. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17(11):1793-803. doi: 10.1017/s1461145714000984.
  18. Batista EK, Klauss J, Fregni F, Nitsche MA, Nakamura-Palacios EM. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of targeted prefrontal cortex modulation with bilateral tDCS in patients with crack-cocaine dependence. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015;18(12). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv066.
  19. Boggio PS, Sultani N, Fecteau S, Merabet L, Mecca T, Pascual- Leone A, et al. Prefrontal cortex modulation using transcranial DC stimulation reduces alcohol craving: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;92(1- 3):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.06.011.
  20. Falcone M, Bernardo L, Ashare RL, Hamilton R, Faseyitan O, McKee SA, et al. Transcranial direct current brain stimulation increases ability to resist smoking. Brain Stimul. 2016;9(2):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.10.004.
  21. Verveer I, van der Veen FM, Shahbabaie A, Remmerswaal D, Franken IHA. Multi-session electrical neuromodulation effects on craving, relapse and cognitive functions in cocaine use disorder: a randomized, sham-controlled tDCS study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;217:108429. doi: 10.1016/j. drugalcdep.2020.108429.
  22. Meng Z, Liu C, Yu C, Ma Y. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the frontal-parietal-temporal area attenuates smoking behavior. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;54:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.007.
  23. Pascual-Marqui RD, Esslen M, Kochi K, Lehmann D. Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2002;24 Suppl C:91-5.
  24. Nakamura-Palacios EM, Lopes IB, Souza RA, Klauss J, Batista EK, Conti CL, et al. Ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) as a target of the dorsolateral prefrontal modulation by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in drug addiction. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2016;123(10):1179-94. doi: 10.1007/s00702-016-1559-9.
  25. Mostafavi H, Dadashi M, Armani Kia A, Ahmadi D, Pirzeh R, Eskandari Z. The effect of bilateral tDCS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the cognitive abilities of men with opioid use disorder under methadone therapy: a sham-controlled clinical trial. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2021;57(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s41983-021-00401-5.
  26. Sadeghi Bimorgh M, Omidi A, Ghoreishi FS, Rezaei Ardani A, Ghaderi A, Banafshe HR. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on relapse, anxiety, and depression in patients with opioid dependence under methadone maintenance treatment: a pilot study. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:401. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00401.
  27. Mostafavi H, Dadashi M, Faridi A, Kazemzadeh F, Eskandari Z. Using bilateral tDCS to modulate EEG amplitude and coherence of men with opioid use disorder under methadone therapy: a sham-controlled clinical trial. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2022;53(3):184-95. doi: 10.1177/15500594211022100.
  28. Namazpoor J, Radfar M, Ghavami H, Sheikhi N. The effectiveness of applying continuous care model on lapse and craving of patients that are treated with methadone maintenance therapy. Nurs Midwifery J. 2017;15(2):127-38. [Persian].
  29. Franken IH, Hendriksa VM, van den Brink W. Initial validation of two opiate craving questionnaires the obsessive-compulsive drug use scale and the desires for drug questionnaire. Addict Behav. 2002;27(5):675-85. doi: 10.1016/s0306- 4603(01)00201-5.
  30. Poor-Seyed SF, Mousavi SV, Kafi SM. Comparing and the relationship between stress and craving usage in addicted to opium and industrial substances. Scientific Quarterly Research on Addiction. 2013;6(24):9-26. [Persian].
  31. Taremian F, Nazari S, Moradveisi L, Moloodi R. Transcranial direct current stimulation on opium craving, depression, and anxiety: a preliminary study. J ECT. 2019;35(3):201-6. doi: 10.1097/yct.0000000000000568.
  32. Arnsten AF, Rubia K. Neurobiological circuits regulating attention, cognitive control, motivation, and emotion: disruptions in neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(4):356-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.008.
  33. Fonteneau C, Redoute J, Haesebaert F, Le Bars D, Costes N, Suaud-Chagny MF, et al. Frontal transcranial direct current stimulation induces dopamine release in the ventral striatum in human. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(7):2636-46. doi: 10.1093/ cercor/bhy093.
  34. Wilson SJ, Sayette MA, Fiez JA. Prefrontal responses to drug cues: a neurocognitive analysis. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(3):211- 4. doi: 10.1038/nn1200.
  35. Tanaka T, Takano Y, Tanaka S, Hironaka N, Kobayashi K, Hanakawa T, et al. Transcranial direct-current stimulation increases extracellular dopamine levels in the rat striatum. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7:6. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00006.
  36. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction. 2001;96(1):103-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1360- 0443.2001.9611038.x.
  37. Stramaccia DF, Penolazzi B, Sartori G, Braga M, Mondini S, Galfano G. Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2015;233(8):2283-90. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4297-6.
  38. Hogeveen J, Grafman J, Aboseria M, David A, Bikson M, Hauner KK. Effects of high-definition and conventional tDCS on response inhibition. Brain Stimul. 2016;9(5):720-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.04.015.
  39. Fecteau S, Knoch D, Fregni F, Sultani N, Boggio P, Pascual- Leone A. Diminishing risk-taking behavior by modulating activity in the prefrontal cortex: a direct current stimulation study. J Neurosci. 2007;27(46):12500-5. doi: 10.1523/ jneurosci.3283-07.2007.
  40. Knoch D, Gianotti LR, Pascual-Leone A, Treyer V, Regard M, Hohmann M, et al. Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior. J Neurosci. 2006;26(24):6469- 72. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0804-06.2006.
Addiction & Health
Volume 17
Pages 1-8

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics