The Impact of Graphic Health Warning Labels on Smokeless Tobacco Packets on Motivation to Quit among Current Users: A Cross-Sectional Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

2 Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

10.34172/ahj.1600

Abstract

Background: Smokeless tobacco (SLT) use constitutes a considerable public health concern, especially in India, where there are more than 300 million users. This study seeks to assess the influence of graphic health warning labels (GHWLs) on smokeless tobacco (SLT) packaging on encouraging cessation among users.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Faculty of Dental Sciences, BHU, Varanasi outpatient department, from December 2023 to April 2024. The study involved 387 participants, selected via simple random sampling, who were current smokeless tobacco users. Data was collected through structured interviews using a validated questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.
Findings: Awareness of GHWLs was high, with 91.7% of participants recognizing the labels. Among these, 66% considered quitting or reducing smokeless tobacco use due to the labels. Increased health awareness and serious consideration to quit were reported by 50.1% of participants, while 28.9% reported no impact. Awareness of tobacco cessation clinics was moderate at 48.1%, and 66.1% expressed willingness to seek help, primarily due to health concerns. Positive correlations were found between education level and awareness (r = 0.387) and education and attitude towards quitting (r = 0.227). Younger participants and those with shorter durations of smokeless tobacco use exhibited higher health awareness and a greater likelihood of considering cessation.
Conclusion: GHWLs are a potent tool in tobacco control, significantly influencing smokeless tobacco users’ intentions to quit. A multifaceted approach involving GHWLs and comprehensive support systems can substantially reduce smokeless tobacco use and its associated health risks.

Highlights

Mahesh R Khairnar(google scholar)(pubmed)

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC). Geneva: WHO. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/teams/ tobacco/who-framework-convention-on-tobacco-control- (who-fctc). Accessed September 2, 2024.
  2. Bhawna G. Burden of smoked and smokeless tobacco consumption in India - results from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey India (GATS-India)- 2009-201. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(5):3323-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.5.3323.
  3. Thakur JS, Paika R. Determinants of smokeless tobacco use in India. Indian J Med Res. 2018;148(1):41-5. doi: 10.4103/ijmr. IJMR_27_18.
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Adult Tobacco Survey India 2016-17. Geneva: WHO; 2019. Available from: https://ntcp.nhp.gov.in/assets/document/surveys-reports-publications/Global-Adult-Tobacco-Survey-Second-Round- India-2016-2017.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2024.
  5. Siddiqi K, Husain S, Vidyasagaran A, Readshaw A, Mishu MP, Sheikh A. Global burden of disease due to smokeless tobacco consumption in adults: an updated analysis of data from 127 countries. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12916- 020-01677-9.
  6. Niaz K, Maqbool F, Khan F, Bahadar H, Ismail Hassan F, Abdollahi M. Smokeless tobacco (paan and gutkha) consumption, prevalence, and contribution to oral cancer. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017009. doi: 10.4178/epih. e2017009.
  7. Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. GATS2 (Global Adult Tobacco Survey) Fact Sheet India 2016-17. Mumbai: TISS; 2016. Available from: https:// www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/global/pdfs/en/GATS_ India_2016-17_FactSheet.pdf.
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Adult Tobacco Survey India 2016-17. Geneva: WHO; 2019. Available from: https://ntcp.nhp.gov.in/assets/document/surveys-reports-publications/Global-Adult-Tobacco-Survey-Second-Round- India-2016-2017.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2024.
  9. Gupta PC, Ray CS. Smokeless tobacco and health in India and South Asia. Respirology. 2003;8(4):419-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00507.x.
  10. Chugh A, Arora M, Jain N, Vidyasagaran A, Readshaw A, Sheikh A, et al. The global impact of tobacco control policies on smokeless tobacco use: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(6):e953-e68. doi: 10.1016/s2214- 109x(23)00205-x.
  11. Khan A, Huque R, Shah SK, Kaur J, Baral S, Gupta PC, et al. Smokeless tobacco control policies in South Asia: a gap analysis and recommendations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(6):890-4. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu020 .
  12. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Manual for Developing Tobacco Control Legislation in The Region of the Americas. Washington, DC: PAHO; 2013.
  13. European Commission. Tobacco: Product Regulation. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu/tobacco/product-regulation_en. Accessed July 24, 2024.
  14. Tobacco Control Law and Related Laws In India. National Tobacco Control Program. Available from: https://ntcp.mohfw. gov.in/acts_rules_regulations. Accessed July 24, 2024
  15. World Health Organization (WHO). MPOWER: A Policy Package to Reverse the Tobacco Epidemic. Geneva: WHO; 2008. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/43888. Accessed July 24, 2024.
  16. World Health Organization (WHO). Packaging and Labeling of Tobacco Products. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control [Internet]. Available from: https://fctc.who.int/who-fctc/overview/treaty-instruments/packaging-and-labelling-of-tobacco-products. Accessed July 26, 2024.
  17. Tobacco Pack Surveillance System (TPackSS). Pack Search. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2014.
  18. Gupta VK, Parasramka P, Mishra G, Kumar S, Malhotra S, Kankane N, et al. Evaluation of awareness regarding pictorial warning on tobacco packets and its effect on cessation among tobacco users in Lucknow. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022;13(1):72-7. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_95_20.
  19. Iacobelli M, Saraf S, Welding K, Clegg Smith K, Cohen JE. Manipulated: graphic health warnings on smokeless tobacco in rural India. Tob Control. 2020;29(2):241-2. doi: 10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2018-054715.
  20. Hammond D, Wakefield M, Durkin S, Brennan E. Tobacco packaging and mass media campaigns: research needs for Articles 11 and 12 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(4):817-31. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts202.
  21. Saraf S, Welding K, Iacobelli M, Cohen JE, Gupta PC, Smith KC. Health warning label compliance for smokeless tobacco products and bidis in five Indian states. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(S2):59-64. doi: 10.31557/apjcp.2021.22. S2.59.
  22. Mudey A, Shukla A, Choudhari SG, Joshi A. Does the graphic health warning on tobacco products have an influence on tobacco consumers in India? A scoping review. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e38304. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38304.
  23. Gravely S, Fong GT, Driezen P, Xu S, Quah AC, Sansone G, et al. An examination of the effectiveness of health warning labels on smokeless tobacco products in four states in India: findings from the TCP India cohort survey. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3899-7.
  24. Vanishree N, Narayan RR, Naveen N, Bullapa D, Vignesh D, Raveendran NM. Impact of pictorial warning labels on tobacco products among patients attending outpatient department of a dental college in Bangalore city: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Cancer. 2017;54(2):461-6. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_203_17.
  25. Klein EG, Quisenberry AJ, Shoben AB, Cooper S, Ferketich AK, Berman M, et al. Health warning labels for smokeless tobacco: the impact of graphic images on attention, recall, and craving. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;19(10):1172-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx021.
  26. Francis DB, Mason N, Ross JC, Noar SM. Impact of tobacco-pack pictorial warnings on youth and young adults: a systematic review of experimental studies. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17:41. doi: 10.18332/tid/108614.
  27. Noar SM, Hall MG, Francis DB, Ribisl KM, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob Control. 2016;25(3):341-54. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978.
  28. Yong HH, Borland R, Thrasher JF, Thompson ME, Nagelhout GE, Fong GT, et al. Mediational pathways of the impact of cigarette warning labels on quit attempts. Health Psychol. 2014;33(11):1410-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000056.
  29. Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(5):591-615. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700506.
  30. Monshi SS, Alanazi AM, Alzahrani AM, Alzhrani AA, Arbaein TJ, Alharbi KK, et al. Awareness and utilization of smoking cessation clinics in Saudi Arabia, findings from the 2019 Global Adult Tobacco Survey. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00543-0.
  31. Lee EH, Shin SH, Jeong GC. Smoking awareness and intention to quit smoking in smoking female workers: secondary data analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052841.
  32. Grills NJ, Singh R, Singh R, Martin BC. Tobacco usage in Uttarakhand: a dangerous combination of high prevalence, widespread ignorance, and resistance to quitting. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:132120. doi: 10.1155/2015/132120.
  33. Wang M, Ma Y, Zhang X. The association of smokers’ health literacy with willingness to quit smoking Chinese adults. Curr Psychol. 2024;43(19):17593-601. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023- 05366-7.
Addiction & Health
Volume 17
Pages 1-9

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics