Navigating Challenges in Tobacco Control: A Systematic Review of Barriers to Implementing Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC)

Document Type : Review Article(s)

Authors

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Government Dental College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

10.34172/ahj.1603

Abstract

Background: Tobacco control efforts face substantial obstacles from industry interference and regulatory weaknesses. This review synthesizes qualitative evidence on barriers to implementing effective tobacco control measures, offering actionable recommendations for policymakers and practitioners.
Objective: To identify barriers to implementing tobacco control measures, specifically Article 5.3 of the WHO FCTC, and propose solutions to overcome them.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library, using keywords like “tobacco,” “industry,” and “interference.” The search, limited to English-language studies published until July 15, 2024, included qualitative studies addressing barriers to implementing Article 5.3. Eligible studies focused on government policies, institutional actions, economic measures, and public awareness. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565548). Study quality was assessed using the CASP checklist, and confidence in findings was evaluated with GRADE-CERQual.
Findings: Twelve qualitative studies were included, covering regions such as Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Uganda, and the UK Overseas Territories. Key barriers identified were conflicts of interest involving government officials, lobbying by the tobacco industry, resource constraints, weak regulatory frameworks, and limited awareness of Article 5.3. Economic considerations often overshadowed public health priorities, further enabling industry influence.
Conclusion: Addressing these barriers requires strengthened regulations, improved coordination, and enhanced support for tobacco control initiatives. Efforts should prioritize reducing conflicts of interest, increasing awareness of Article 5.3, and balancing public health and economic interests. Public health dentists and policymakers must collaborate to ensure effective tobacco control measures are implemented and sustained.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Implementation of Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. WHO; 2008.
  3. Doku D. The tobacco industry tactics-a challenge for tobacco control in low- and middle-income countries. Afr Health Sci. 2010;10(2):201-3.
  4. Gilmore AB, Fooks G, Drope J, Bialous SA, Jackson RR. Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2015;385(9972):1029-43. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60312-9.
  5. Fooks GJ, Smith J, Lee K, Holden C. Controlling corporate influence in health policy making? An assessment of the implementation of article 5.3 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Global Health. 2017;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0234-8.
  6. Sebrié EM, Glantz SA. Attempts to undermine tobacco control: tobacco industry “youth smoking prevention” programs to undermine meaningful tobacco control in Latin America. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(8):1357-67. doi: 10.2105/ ajph.2006.094128.
  7. Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0.
  8. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
  9. Your Personal Research Assistant. Available from: https://www.zotero.org.
  10. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
  11. Abdullah SM, Wagner-Rizvi T, Huque R, Kanan S, Huque S, Ralston R, et al. ‘A contradiction between our state and the tobacco company’: conflicts of interest and institutional constraints as barriers to implementing Article 5.3 in Bangladesh. Tob Control. 2022;31(Suppl 1):s33-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057142.
  12. Balwicki Ł, Stokłosa M, Balwicka-Szczyrba M, Tomczak W. Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices. Tob Control. 2016;25(5):521-6. doi: 10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2015-052582.
  13. Barry RA, Abdullah SM, Chugh A, Hirpa S, Kumar P, Male D, et al. Advancing whole-of-government approaches to tobacco control: Article 5.3 and the challenge of policy coordination in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India and Uganda. Tob Control. 2022;31(Suppl 1):s46-52. doi: 10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2021-057154.
  14. Barry RA, Hill SE, Williams S, Collin J. Challenges of conflict of interest, coordination and collaboration in small island contexts: towards effective tobacco control governance in UK Overseas Territories. Tob Control. 2022;31(Suppl 1):s39-45. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057077.
  15. Charoenca N, Mock J, Kungskulniti N, Preechawong S, Kojetin N, Hamann SL. Success counteracting tobacco company interference in Thailand: an example of FCTC implementation for low- and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(4):1111-34. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9041111.
  16. Erku DA, Tesfaye ET. Tobacco control and prevention efforts in Ethiopia pre- and post-ratification of WHO FCTC: current challenges and future directions. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17:13. doi: 10.18332/tid/102286.
  17. Goel S, Kar SS, Verma M, Sivanantham P, Naik BN, Gupta D. Evidence on article 5.3 of FCTC (tobacco industry interference in tobacco control activities) in India-a qualitative scoping study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1855. doi: 10.1186/ s12889-021-11773-x.
  18. Kumar P, Barry RA, Kulkarni MM, Kamath VG, Ralston R, Collin J. Institutional tensions, corporate social responsibility and district-level governance of tobacco industry interference: analysing challenges in local implementation of Article 5.3 measures in Karnataka, India. Tob Control. 2022;31(Suppl 1):s26-32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057113.
  19. Lie JL, Willemsen MC, de Vries NK, Fooks G. The devil is in the detail: tobacco industry political influence in the Dutch implementation of the 2001 EU Tobacco Products Directive. Tob Control. 2016;25(5):545-50. doi: 10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2015-052302.
  20. Male D, Ralston R, Nyamurungi K, Collin J. ‘That is a Ministry of Health thing’: Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability. Tob Control. 2022;31(Suppl 1):s12-7. doi: 10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2021-057049.
  21. Matthes BK, Robertson L, Gilmore AB. Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e044710. doi: 10.1136/ bmjopen-2020-044710.
  22. Shahriar MH, Hasan MM, Alam MS, Matthes BK, Gilmore AB, Zubair AB. Tobacco industry interference to undermine the development and implementation of graphic health warnings in Bangladesh. Tob Control. 2024;33(5):587-95. doi: 10.1136/ tc-2022-057538.
  23. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). CASP Qualitative Checklist. 2018. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists.
  24. Smith KE, Fooks G, Collin J, Weishaar H, Mandal S, Gilmore AB. “Working the system”--British American tobacco’s influence on the European union treaty and its implications for policy: an analysis of internal tobacco industry documents. PLoS Med. 2010;7(1):e1000202. doi: 10.1371/journal. pmed.1000202.
  25. Hurt RD, Ebbert JO, Achadi A, Croghan IT. Roadmap to a tobacco epidemic: transnational tobacco companies invade Indonesia. Tob Control. 2012;21(3):306-12. doi: 10.1136/ tc.2010.036814.
  26. Assunta M, Dorotheo EU. SEATCA Tobacco Industry Interference Index: a tool for measuring implementation of WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3. Tob Control. 2016;25(3):313-8. doi: 10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2014-051934.
  27. Chantornvong S, Collin J, Dodgson R, Lee K, McCargo D, Seddon D, et al. Political economy of tobacco control in low-income and middle-income countries: lessons from Thailand and Zimbabwe. Global Analysis Project Team. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(7):913-9.
  28. Lee K, Eckhardt J, Holden C. Tobacco industry globalization and global health governance: towards an interdisciplinary research agenda. Palgrave Commun. 2016;2:16037. doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.37.
  29. Crosbie E, Sosa P, Glantz SA. Defending strong tobacco packaging and labelling regulations in Uruguay:transnational tobacco control network versus Philip Morris International. Tob Control. 2018;27(2):185-94. doi: 10.1136/ tobaccocontrol-2017-053690.
  30. Fooks GJ, Gilmore AB, Smith KE, Collin J, Holden C, Lee K. Corporate social responsibility and access to policy élites: an analysis of tobacco industry documents. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8):e1001076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001076.
  31. Mamudu HM, John RM, Veeranki SP, Ouma AE. The odd man out in sub-Saharan Africa: understanding the tobacco use prevalence in Madagascar. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:856. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-856.
  32. Gravely S, Giovino GA, Craig L, Commar A, D’Espaignet ET, Schotte K, et al. Implementation of key demand-reduction measures of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and change in smoking prevalence in 126 countries: an association study. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(4):e166- 74. doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30045-2.
Addiction & Health
Volume 17
Pages 1-21

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics