Internet Addiction and the Psychometric Properties of the Nine-item Internet Disorder Scale–Short Form: An Application of Rasch Analysis

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey AND Department of Evidence for Population Health Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

2 Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

3 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

4 Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey University of Kastamonu, Kastamonu, Turkey

5 Department of Public Health, Capa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of disordered internet use among
adolescent university students and its association with various health complaints and behaviours, and most
importantly to examine the psychometric properties of 9-item Internet Disorder Scale-Short Form (IDS9-SF)
using factor analyses and Rasch analysis.
Methods: A total of 1988 university students aged 18 to 25 years were selected via a multi-stage stratified
random sampling technique among university students in Istanbul, Turkey (September 2017 to February
2018). Data collected included socio-demographics, lifestyle and dietary habits, and the 9-item IDS9-SF.
Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, multivariate analyses, factor analyses, path analysis, and
Rasch analysis.
Findings: Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the study investigated the latent structure of the IDS9-SF
instrument and results supported its reliability and validity. The prevalence of disordered internet use was
18.3% in the sample. There were significant differences between those who had disordered internet use and
those who did not in gender, family income, school performance, number of bedrooms at home, and number
of people living at home, as well as internet use duration. Using multivariate regression analysis, key
predictors of disordered internet use included (among others): gender, body mass index (BMI), household
income, number of people living at home, having a computer at home, internet facilities, duration of internet
use, sleeping hours, frequency of eating fast food, watching television, headache, hurting eyes, tired eyes, and
hearing problems. Rash analysis demonstrated that four of the nine items (2, 3, 6, and 7) were more difficult
for individuals to endorse compared to other items.
Conclusion: Problems arising from excessive internet use were apparent among the study sample and the
IDS9-SF is a valid and reliable measure for assessing disordered internet use among Turkish adolescent
population


Keywords


Ramezani M, Salehi M, Namiranian N, Salehi M.
Validity and reliability of the Chen internet addiction
scale. J Fundam Ment Health 2012; 14(3): 236-45.
[In Persian].
2. Griffiths M. Internet addiction - time to be taken
seriously? Addiction Research 2000; 8(5): 413-8.
3. Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a
new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998;
1(3): 237-44.
4. Kuss DJ, Griffiths M. Internet addiction in
psychotherapy. Houndmills, Basingstoke,
Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.
5. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Karila L, Billieux J. Internet
addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological
research for the last decade. Curr Pharm Des 2014;
20(25): 4026-52.
6. Cerniglia L, Zoratto F, Cimino S, Laviola G,
Ammaniti M, Adriani W. Internet addiction in
adolescence: Neurobiological, psychosocial and
clinical issues. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017; 76(Pt
A): 174-84.
7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5™. 5th
ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing;
2013.
8. Griffiths M. A 'components' model of addiction
within a biopsychosocial framework. J Substance
Use 2005; 10(4): 191-7.
9. Kuss DJ, Shorter GW, van Rooij AJ, van de Mheen
D, Griffiths MD. The internet addiction components
model and personality: Establishing construct
validity via a nomological network. Comput Human
Behav 2014; 39: 312-21.
10. Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Measuring DSM-5
internet gaming disorder: Development and
validation of a short psychometric scale. Comput
Human Behav 2015; 45: 137-43.
11. Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. The development and
psychometric evaluation of the Internet Disorder
Scale (IDS-15). Addict Behav 2017; 64: 261-8.
12. Pontes H, Griffiths M. The development and
psychometric properties of the internet disorder scale
Short Form (IDS9-SF). Addicta: The Turkish Journal
on Addictions 2016; 3(3): 303-18.
13. Widyanto L, Griffiths M. "Internet addiction": A
critical review. Int J Ment Health Addiction 2006;
4(1): 31-51.
14. Park S, Hong KE, Park EJ, Ha KS, Yoo HJ. The
association between problematic internet use and
depression, suicidal ideation and bipolar disorder
symptoms in Korean adolescents. Aust N Z J
Psychiatry 2013; 47(2): 153-9.
15. Bener A, Yildirim E, Torun P, Catan F, Bolat E, Alic
S, et al. Internet addiction, fatigue, and sleep problems
among adolescent students: A large-scale study. Int J
Ment Health Addiction 2019; 17(4): 959-69.
16. Bener A, Al-Mahdi HS, Vachhani PJ, Al-Nufal M,
Ali AI. Do excessive internet use, television viewing
and poor lifestyle habits affect low vision in school
children? J Child Health Care 2010; 14(4): 375-85.
17. Ekinci O, Celik T, Savas N, Toros F. Association
between internet use and sleep problems in
adolescents. Noro Psikiyatr Ars 2014; 51(2): 122-8.
18. Celik V, Yesilyurt E, Korkmaz O, Usta E. From the
perspective of loneliness and cognitive absorption
internet addiction as predictor and predicted. Eurasia
J Math Sci Technol 2014; 10(6): 581-94.
19. Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category
effectiveness. J Appl Meas 2002; 3(1): 85-106.
20. Linacre JM. Rasch Measures and Unidimensionality.
Rasch Measurement Transactions 2011; 24(4): 1310.
21. Li W, O'Brien JE, Snyder SM, Howard MO.
Characteristics of internet addiction/pathological
internet use in U.S. university students: A
qualitative-method investigation. PLoS One 2015;
10(2): e0117372.
Internet Addiction and Application of Rasch Analysis Bener et al.
Addict Health, Autumn 2019; Vol 11, No 4 241
http://ahj.kmu.ac.ir, 07 October
22. Cheng C, Li AY. Internet addiction prevalence and
quality of (real) life: A meta-analysis of 31 nations
across seven world regions. Cyberpsychol Behav
Soc Netw 2014; 17(12): 755-60.
23. Laconi Sp, Kaliszewska-Czeremska K, Gnisci A,
Sergi I, Barke A, Jeromin F, et al. Cross-cultural
study of Problematic Internet Use in nine European
countries. Comput Human Behav 2018; 84: 430-40.
24. Rumpf HJ, Tao R, Rehbein F, Petry NM. Internet
addiction: A future addictive disorder? In: Petry NM,
editor. Behavioral addictions: DSM-5® and beyond.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2016. p.
71-100.
25. Pontes HM, Stavropoulos V, Griffiths MD.
Measurement invariance of the Internet Gaming
Disorder Scale-Short-Form (IGDS9-SF) between the
United States of America, India and the United
Kingdom. Psychiatry Res 2017; 257: 472-8.
26. Stavropoulos V, Beard C, Griffiths MD, Buleigh T,
Gomez R, Pontes HM. Measurement invariance of
the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short-Form
(IGDS9-SF) between Australia, the USA, and the
UK. Int J Ment Health Addict 2018; 16(2): 377-92.
27. Choi K, Son H, Park M, Han J, Kim K, Lee B, et al.
Internet overuse and excessive daytime sleepiness in
adolescents. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009; 63(4):
455-62.
28. Bener A, Bhugra D. Lifestyle and depressive risk
factors associated with problematic internet use in
adolescents in an Arabian Gulf culture. J Addict Med
2013; 7(4): 236-42.
29. Kim Y, Park JY, Kim SB, Jung IK, Lim YS, Kim
JH. The effects of Internet addiction on the lifestyle
and dietary behavior of Korean adolescents. Nutr
Res Pract 2010; 4(1): 51-7.
30. Bener A, Al-Mahdi H, Bhugra D. Lifestyle factors
and internet addiction among school children. Int J
Community Fam Med 2016; 1: 118.